“it Was feared that the idiosincrásico political activism of the President of the Republic could lead to incidents embarrassing,” writes Vital Moreira, a post that he published this Monday in your blog, Cause of Our. It was fear, and is happening, continues the constitutionalist, in a text that analyzes the intervention of Marcelo Rebelo de Sousa in the case of the closure of the Teatro da Cornucópia.
Vital Moreira, who previously had exposed the thesis that the PR is going to go too far in their intervention policy, back to the theme, to paraphrase a declaration of Pedro Santana Lopes who, three weeks ago, said in an interview to the Express that “Marcelo apology for what sometimes is the prime minister”. “Never have we been so close to it as in this unfortunate case of Cornucopia”, warns the constitutionalist, who goes further: “Marcelo Rebelo de Sousa should not avoid only assume the role of prime minister in a theater; they should also avoid appearing as a coach, chairman, or teacher of the Government, that he is not, nor can be.”
In the analysis of the ex-member of the european parliament of the PS, “not just [Marcelo] keep in relation to the Government an unambiguous neutrality political party, that its constitutional function requires, but also to maintain a prudent distance policy, that the separation of powers recommends”. It is there that the head of the State is to fail, and the case Cornucopia is a practical case of this, defends Vital.
The “accidental conciliation”
In the post this Monday, the commentator analyzes the “accidental ‘conciliation’” that the President of the Republic tried to do at the end of the week, “live”, between the person responsible of the Cornucopia, Luís Miguel Cintra, and “an embarrassed Minister of Culture, taken by surprise by the presidential initiative and compelled to commit himself rashly to revisit the case of the grant audience to the theatre.”
An initiative with wide media coverage which, according to Vital Moreira, the President of the Republic, “he did three things that should carefully be avoided: (i) barge-a concrete issue of the venue; (ii) engage in a political dialogue directly with a minister for the sector, when the person building is by definition the Prime minister; (iii) the sponsor of a political solution exceptional for a concrete case, in flagrant violation of the principle of equal treatment.”
The action of government was insignificant, with the minister of Culture to eventually refuse any treatment, except for the theater company, but the red line, this went on to be trampled by Marcelo Rebelo de Sousa, says Vital Moreira., Of the constitutionalist to the constitutionalist.
No comments:
Post a Comment